Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover.
Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :.
Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Roy Harris Translator. The Cours de linguistique generale, reconstructed from students' notes after Saussure's death in , founded modern linguistic theory by breaking the study of language free from a merely historical and comparativist approach.
Course in general linguistics.
Saussure's new method, now known as Structuralism, has since been applied to such diverse areas as art, architecture, folklore, literary criticism,. Saussure's new method, now known as Structuralism, has since been applied to such diverse areas as art, architecture, folklore, literary criticism, and philosophy. Get A Copy. Paperback , pages. Published by Open Court first published More Details Original Title. Scott Moncrieff Prize for Roy Harris Other Editions Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
To ask other readers questions about Course in General Linguistics , please sign up. Darkness you can find it in another library..!?
- Phytochemistry in the Genomics and Post-Genomics Eras.
- About Course in General Linguistics?
- The Accounting Game; Basic Accounting Fresh from the Lemonade Stand, 2008 Edition.
- Basic hydroponics for everyone for Australia and New Zealand?
- Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique: A Lacanian Approach for Practitioners!
- The Universe - Origins and Evolution.
See all 5 questions about Course in General Linguistics…. Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Aug 29, Joshua Nomen-Mutatio rated it liked it Shelves: linguistics , philosophy. But then again, my philosophical alignments have changed a bit sense then as well, so who knows View all 5 comments. Aug 28, Jimmy rated it liked it Shelves: linguistics-semiotics. Short of calling it a pioneer text, it's difficult to really say much else about Saussure's Course in General Linguistics.
As dated as most of the ideas contained within this book are, most of them stand as the founding concepts of linguistics, semiotics, and structuralism. Or, a more grammatically apt way to put it would be to say that it is Saussure's particular methodology that has been the most influential aspect of his thought. His central aim above all else is to analyze language as a syst Short of calling it a pioneer text, it's difficult to really say much else about Saussure's Course in General Linguistics.
His central aim above all else is to analyze language as a system with a structure. This particular quote from pg. This may be within the grammatical context of a syllable, word, sentence, etc. Naturally this takes much of the stress away from phonation, as well as diachronic historical linguistics. Saussure was also more or less one of the first theorists to introduce semiology as a linguistic study.
It's an important book to read if you are interested in contemporary theory at all. The only issue that I have with this book is that it is essentially a translation of lecture notes edited by Saussure's students. So the style tends to be extremely dry, and the book lacks much of a flow.botorganic.in/135.php
Course in General Linguistics - Oxford Reference
However, it's more important that the reader understand the basic concepts of Saussure's thought, and Harris's translation seems to do an adequate job at providing his audience with a comprehensible enough text. View 1 comment. Oct 05, Andrea rated it really liked it Shelves: theory , discourse. Can't believe it took me so long to read this!
It's so foundational to so much theory, and when you read it you will see how it's not the same hearing about that, but isn't that always true? And only reading it did I fully realize that I wasn't reading Saussure at all, but what his students and colleagues thought was Saussure, which clearly is something different and quite collective and thus possibly cooler than Saussure. So no one should just throw the name around as he's not a person anymo Can't believe it took me so long to read this!
So no one should just throw the name around as he's not a person anymore but a collection of ideas that represent the inspiration of one person as influenced and interpreted by a group of others. And we don't have a name for that but we should. So this effort was brilliant, though I agree with almost nothing, but the Western world sure ran with it, hey? Languages are always changing, but it is impossible for humans to change them? It has some amazing illustrations. View 2 comments. Feb 21, Bohdan Pechenyak rated it really liked it Shelves: psychology , social-sciences.
A classical study of linguistics that laid the foundation of the modern science. A bit heavy on examples that break up the flow of the text, but a must-read for anyone interested in studying language and meaning. It is almost impossible to overstate the importance of this book. It is significant not only for laying down a radical vision of linguistics as a discipline for the 20th and 21st centuries, but it also lays the foundations for all modern approaches to semiotics.
Certainly Peirce had made a similar breakthrough in semiotics at around the same time, but his theory was not backed up by such a rich understanding of the study of linguistics - its sub-fields and divisions, the progress it had made, it It is almost impossible to overstate the importance of this book. Certainly Peirce had made a similar breakthrough in semiotics at around the same time, but his theory was not backed up by such a rich understanding of the study of linguistics - its sub-fields and divisions, the progress it had made, its mistaken steps and where it needed to go in the future.
De Saussure demonstrates that language is one semiotic and so a theoretical framework is needed that encompasses both. For a book that was delivered as lectures and then compiled posthumously by students years ago, perhaps what is most surprising is just how much of the book is still relevant and important to the discipline of linguistics today. What is not surprising is just how much de Saussure has been misrepresented by modern linguists.
De Saussure could not imagine syntagms without paradigms, and for him there was no signifier without a signified, so to use his name to support an autonomous syntax or to divide semantics, pragmatics, phonetics and syntax simplifies his theories beyond recognition, and makes a mockery of European linguistics. A grand theory of language, covering phonetics, diachronic and synchronic perspectives and grammar with a semiotic theory, to match de Saussure's has rarely been attempted in the years since his death.
Currently, there are certainly just a few linguists that believe they should even try. Until that view changes we are unlikely to see another linguist with the depth of vision and inspirational views of de Saussure. After wrapping up my readings of Heidegger and Husserl, I found Saussure to be rather refreshing, probably the most influential thinker on my large critical theory reading list since Gramsci.
Backing up just a little bit, Heidegger really seemed to have just contributed a convoluted discussion of the word Dasein and its meaning, which at different times could encompass being, revelation, existence, human being, the universe, etc. I feel Heidegger is too open to interpretation and a discussion of After wrapping up my readings of Heidegger and Husserl, I found Saussure to be rather refreshing, probably the most influential thinker on my large critical theory reading list since Gramsci. I feel Heidegger is too open to interpretation and a discussion of the sign, which is made up of the signal and the signification, is essential after reading Being and Time.